Skip to main content

Paper Byte Series: RTL2RTL Formal Equivalence Checking

·548 words·3 mins·
FV Learner
Author
FV Learner
ASIC Verification Engineer
Table of Contents

In the fast-paced world of chip design, where increasing complexity meets relentless time-to-market pressures, ensuring the correctness of a design is paramount. Traditional simulation-based verification, while powerful, can sometimes leave gaps, especially when dealing with incremental design changes. This is where RTL2RTL Formal Equivalence Checking steps in as a game-changer, offering a mathematically rigorous approach to boost design confidence.

What is RTL2RTL Formal Equivalence Checking?
#

At its core, RTL2RTL (Register Transfer Level to Register Transfer Level) formal equivalence checking is a technique that formally proves that two different RTL representations of a circuit design behave identically. Unlike simulation, which tests specific scenarios, formal equivalence checking exhaustively explores all possible input combinations and states, providing a complete coverage guarantee.

Imagine you’ve made a minor optimization, a timing fix, or a logic redistribution in your RTL code. How do you ensure these changes haven’t inadvertently introduced new bugs or altered the intended functionality? Traditionally, this would involve extensive re-simulation, a time-consuming and often incomplete process. RTL2RTL formal equivalence checking provides a powerful alternative, allowing designers to quickly and definitively verify that the modified RTL is functionally equivalent to the original, trusted version.

Why It’s Crucial for Modern Chip Design
#

The benefits of incorporating RTL2RTL formal equivalence checking into the design flow are significant:

  • Accelerated Verification Cycles: By quickly proving the equivalence of design changes, it drastically reduces the need for lengthy simulation regressions, leading to faster verification closure.
  • Reduced Costly Re-spins: Catching functional bugs early in the design cycle, before silicon fabrication, prevents expensive re-spins and delays.
  • Enhanced Design Confidence: The exhaustive nature of formal verification provides a higher level of assurance in the correctness of the design, especially after modifications.
  • Faster Design Iterations: Designers can make changes with greater confidence, knowing that a robust formal method is in place to verify their impact.
  • Uncovering Hidden Bugs: Formal methods can uncover corner-case bugs that are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to find with simulation alone.

Practical Applications
#

RTL2RTL formal equivalence checking is particularly effective in scenarios such as:

  • Pipeline Optimizations: Verifying that changes made to improve pipeline efficiency do not alter functionality.
  • Timing Fixes: Ensuring that logic modifications for timing closure maintain functional equivalence.
  • Logic Redistributions: Confirming that re-architecting logic blocks for area or power optimization doesn’t introduce errors.
  • Incremental Feature Additions: Rapidly verifying the impact of new features on existing logic.
  • IP Integration: Ensuring that integrated IP blocks behave as expected after modifications or customization.

Integration into the Verification Flow
#

RTL2RTL formal equivalence checking seamlessly integrates into existing design and verification flows. It acts as a powerful complement to traditional simulation, allowing verification engineers to focus their simulation efforts on more complex, system-level scenarios, while relying on formal methods for exhaustive verification of design changes.

In conclusion, as chip designs continue to grow in complexity, the need for robust and efficient verification methodologies becomes more critical than ever. RTL2RTL formal equivalence checking offers a compelling solution, empowering designers with the confidence to innovate and accelerate their design cycles, ultimately leading to higher quality and more reliable silicon.


Credit: This blog post is inspired by the paper:

“RTL2RTL Formal Equivalence: Boosting the Design Confidence” Authors: M V Achutha Kiran Kumar, Aarti Gupta, S S Bindumadhava (Intel Corporation) Source: DVCon Proceedings (also available on arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/1407.6342 )